Keynote debates: Why care about the end of life?

As people we have always cared about the end of life. In the past we cared because the fate of the dead was important - we may care less about this now than before, but we do care, and probably worry about, how we will die. Yet, in relation to some groups of people, we are less inclined to think about this topic. One of those groups includes people with intellectual disabilities and those who survive them. However, the coronavirus has, to an extent, changed this. Death, dying and people with intellectual disabilities are now more talked about than ever before. It is, perhaps, the last act of inclusion, to draw people into conversations about death, to draw death into conversations about intellectual disability - to talk about what it means to die with an intellectual disability, or to experience the death of a person with an intellectual disability. These are conversations that are becoming possible, but they still retain challenges and taboos. These are conversations of importance to everyone connected to intellectual disabilities, whether as an individual, a relative, a professional, a researcher or a policy maker. What do we do about death? What should we do about death in intellectual disabilities? Of course we should stop premature death - that is where we have most of the conversations. However, death will happen, too soon, maybe too late, but happen it will. And when it happens, it has some meaning for us all.

Family carers will continue to have to live. Services will have to continue. Where are the dying and dead in the stories of families and services, the stories about what they do? Quality of life doesn’t end when someone is dying; it becomes perhaps even more important. How do schools support young people with intellectual disabilities who have experienced a death? What are the health care needs of people who are dying? Where does death fit into conversations about aging? What do the law and ethics tell us about death? How much are mental health outcomes influenced by experiences of dying? Is there a single strand of IDD research where death is of no relevance? Bringing death into conversations about our work and why we do the work we do is the final act of inclusion in the modern world.More information will follow soon.

Keynote speaker: Prof. Dr. Stuart Todd

Dr. Todd is leading the debate concerning the question “Why care about the end of life?” The debate will consider why death is an important concern for research across many disciplines within the field of intellectual disabilities (ID), now more than ever. It will focus on issues relating to why this is an important area for research and why decisions about whether someone with an ID might be reaching the end of their life are important for individuals and their carers. Dr. Todd completed his undergraduate degree in psychology at the University of Edinburgh. He then worked as a research assistant in the Information Services Division of the Scottish Health Service before moving to Cardiff. He took up a research post there with what was later to become the Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities at Cardiff University. He completed his PhD there and primarily led qualitative research studies concerning the lives and careers of family carers of people with ID. He also developed and led research studies on the relationship between death, dying and ID. This later work was further developed when he joined the Unit for Development in Intellectual and Developmental Disability (UDIDD), at the University of South Wales, where he is a Professor in Intellectual Disability Research. His recent work has focused on mortality and care at the end of life in ID services across the UK, work that is currently being updated to capture the impact of Covid19. This work has also been extended to look at mortality of people with ID living in generic care settings for older people. He is currently also working with colleagues to look at issues of death, dying and disposal in an English asylum during the 1918-19 pandemic. 

Keynote speaker: Stuart Todd

Co-speaker: Dr. Michael Echteld

I am professor (“lector”) of End of Life Care (“Zorg rond het Levenseinde”) at the Avans University of Applied Sciences palliative care project leader at Stichting Prisma. At Avans I lead several research projects on end of life topics including spiritual care, shared decision making and end of life care for older people, people with intellectual disability, homeless people and people with autism spectrum disorder. We are also committed to increase awareness of palliative care and end of life issues in the education of our students and in the general public. Stichting Prisma is a care organisation for people with intellectual disabilities. My responsibilities as palliative care project leader include initialising, supervising and reporting on research on palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities. Aim is to improve care by increasing awareness of palliative care, training personnel and contributing to the development of care guidelines. I also aim at developing a functional national and international network.

Co-speaker: Dr. Michael Echteld

Debate leader: Prof. Dr. Carlo Leget

Prof. Dr. Carlo Leget is full professor of care ethics at the University of Humanistic Studies in Utrecht, the Netherlands. At the same university he holds an endowed chair in palliative care, established by the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) and the Association Hospice Care Netherlands (AHZN). He is a member of the Health Council of the Netherlands.

Co-keynote speaker: Carlo Ledget

Our sponsors


Events Center Amsterdam UMC
VUmc | Medische Faculteit C2
Van der Boechorststraat 7
1881 BT Amsterdam
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

IASSIDD - International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabillities

Copyright®  -   Privacy Policy